Postgraduate Options in Australian Universities Assignment

Essays on Postgraduate Options in Australian Universities Assignment The paper "Postgraduate Options in Australian Universities" is a wonderful example of an assignment on education. Post graduate education in the world is in high demand today. This is probably because of numerous technological, environmental, social, and economic changes in society. To cope with these sudden changes, people opt to pursue postgraduate education in various higher institutions so as to keep up with the competitive world. Their choices vary in terms of learning institutions, and courses. This difference is brought about by the diverse personality attributes, as well as their demographics.Therefore, this essay attempts to create a decision matrix based on university and postgraduate options of three individuals. Secondly, the paper will calculate their evaluative rankings based on a compensatory rule, and then analyze personality traits. It also explores the respondents’ difference in choices and evaluative rankings and uses demographic and personality theories to analyze their choices.Table of contentsIntroductionCurrently, there is a high demand for postgraduate education because the world is getting more and more competitive. In effect, individuals resolve to take postgraduate education so as to cope with these changes. Nevertheless, their choices are determined by various issues relating to demographics and personality traits. Some of the demographic factors include age, income, gender, and family situation. On the other hand, postgraduate choices are determined by personal traits like extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, conscientiousness, and openness to experience.Postgraduate options in Australian universitiesMasters in Business Administration (Marketing) at Charles Stuart University (CSU) in AustraliaMaster of Science (Computer Science) at Central Queensland University (CQU)Masters of Science (Environmental Science) at University of Melbourne (UM)Masters of Science (Psychiatry) at University of New South Wales (UNSW)Masters of S cience (Nursing) at University of Western Australia (USW)Masters of Economics at Charles Stuart University (CSU) in AustraliaEvaluative criteriaTuition feesDuration of the programLevel of interest of the courseProgram reputationDistance from workDecision matrixJane’s evaluationOptionsTuition feesDurationInterest levelProgram reputationDistanceEntry requirementsMBA(Marketing) at CSU; rank=4525543Msc. Computer science at CQU; rank=5532534Msc (Environmental science ) at UM; rank=2343424Msc. Nursing at USW; rank=3543434Msc. Psychiatry at UNSW; rank=5422544M. Economics at CSU; rank=4534544David’s evaluationOptionsTuition feesDurationInterest levelProgram reputationDistanceEntry requirementsMBA(Marketing) at CSU; rank=5524523Msc. Computer science at CQU; rank=5443522Msc (Environmental science ) at UM; rank=3334435Msc. Nursing at USW; rank=3543524Msc. Psychiatry at UNSW rank=4433452M. Economics at CSU; rank=2432534

Obesity and Government Control Free Essays

Obesity and Government Control In today’s society there are many Americans who are either overweight or obese and have diabetes. David Zinczenko in â€Å"Don’t Blame the Eater† argues that fast food companies ate to be blamed for the obesity that is now very common in the US. Radley Balko argues in â€Å"What You Eat is Your Business† that the government is responsible for the obesity epidemic that the US is found in today. We will write a custom essay sample on Obesity and Government Control or any similar topic only for you Order Now The government should have some in not all control or regulations on what the people of the country decide to eat. With no control the US is headed for a nation of overweight, obese, diabetic, and unhealthy people. Before the early 1990’s, diabetes found in children were usually because of genetic disorders and around five percent of the children were obsess or had Type Two diabetes. According to the National Institute of Health, about thirty percent of the children population has Type Two diabetes. Because of the increase in the amount of people who are being diagnosed with diabetes, the amount of money spent on health care costs is a surprising one hundred billion a year. Since 1969 that has been a dramatic increase of about ninety-seven billion. (Zinczenko) Zinczenko argues that many fast food restaurants don’t give information on the calorie count their food contains. Unlike grocery items, there aren’t many fast food companies that provide their clients with the calorie information on their food labels. By not giving out this important information, consumers aren’t aware of the unhealthy consumptions. Although this is a good point, we as humans are smart enough to know that if we walk into a fast food restaurant, the food we buy isn’t going to be the healthiest and that if we eat this type of food twice a day every day or even every other day, we will eventually put on a great amount of weight and make our body vulnerable to health risks such as diabetes. The government should make it a law for restaurants such a McDonald’s, Burger King, and Wendy’s put exactly how many calories each thing on their menu has. The fast food industry doesn’t only target adult but also children by selling kids meals that come with a toy from that popular movie every child wants or has watched or that popular toy company. This is how they attract kids but in return for the money, they give kids that delicious but unhealthy burger with a toy that usually ends up lost or in the garbage after a few days or even hours. Instead of giving a side of fries and soda, what they should do is give kids a daily fruit serving with he choice of either orange or apple juice. There should be a regulation on the amount of calories children can consume at these restaurants. These children are the future of the country and if they grow up having horrible eating habits, how this country going to get anywhere with people who aren’t able to do a certain job because of their health problems? The government should put very tight restrictions on how the fast food industry carries itself when it comes to selling food that isn’t healthy. According to Zinczenko, â€Å"prepared foods aren’t covered under Food and Drug Administration labeling laws. † (Zinczenko 393) This is one very important thing that the government should definitely change. People need to be informed with the amount of calorie intake that delicious Whopper has. If the person sees how many calories they are eating they may second guess about eating fast food four times a week. Changing this regulation can make a difference on someone’s life. Balko states that, â€Å"state legislatures and school boards across the country have begun banning snacks and soda from school campuses and vending machines,† (Balko 396) and that this is not the way to combat obesity. By the government banning the unhealthy foods we eat, they are taking responsibility on our health care and wellness, instead of us worrying and taking care of ourselves. Although Balko makes a good point, right now the government had no control on our food consumption choices and we are still making horrible health choices. If the government takes control on the food we can and can’t eat, we soon will accustom ourselves to pick a fresh apple over some deep fried onion rings. Pretty soon the US will find itself in a society where the amount of people who are diabetic and obese isn’t sky rocketing. Like everything, there is always going to be those people who don’t agree with the government telling us what to eat and what not to eat. The way I see it right now, in this specific time in life, I would agree with the government helping us out. A little push won’t hurt and in the long run it can make a huge difference on our own health and for the health of those we care most, them being our children, parents, family, and friends. Works Cited Graff, Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. â€Å"Don’t Blame the Eater. † They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: W. W. Norton , 2010. 391-94. Print. Graff, Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. â€Å"What You Eat Is Your Business. † They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. New York: W. W. Norton , 2010. 395-99. Print How to cite Obesity and Government Control, Papers

Khkh free essay sample

The colonist were a good profit for them and din t want to risk loosing them. Also the British thought it wasnt right for you to just break away from your king. Reason the colonists broke away is because they felt like they were being unfairly taxed because they had no representative in the Parliament. The king would not let the colonists govern themselves. After the colonist protested against the Sugar and Stamp Act, the Parliament passed the Declaratory Act. This Act was meant for the colonists to do what ever theParliament said. This made the colonists upset because they would have no say in anything they had to do. The colonists were also not allowed to trade with whoever they wanted to trade with. The British then passed the Navigation Acts. This Act made the colonists only be allowed to trade with England. This angered the colonists because they wanted the right to choose who they traded with. We will write a custom essay sample on Khkh or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Because of the French and Indian War, the British had to raise taxes. The British created the Sugar Act.Since the Parliament and King saw it just as another tax, the colonists were angered because they had no say in the Parliament. After the colonists protested the Sugar Act it was repealed and then the Stamp Act was created. Then the Townsend Act was created which taxed lead, paint, tea, etc. Then the colonists protested against this which caused it to be repealed except for the tea. The tea tax caused the Boston Tea Party. So the Parliament passed the Intolerable Acts which forced colonists to quarter soldiers. All this led up to the colonists breaking away from the British.